Many lies of heliocentrism only exist to prop up other lies. Science bros continually offer assumptions as proofs, without realizing they are assumptions. They rely on one assumption to make the next one true.
They say, “I know the ocean looks level, but it is actually curved. The ocean is curved because the earth is curved.” Then we say, “But how do you know the earth is curved?” They don’t realize that curved earth is an assumption, with no evidence to support it. So they get themselves into a loop of circular reasoning, where the ocean is curved because the earth is curved because the ocean is curved.
This loop is only broken by an appeal to authority, which they say is the scientific establishment, but if you probe a little deeper, it’s usually their Grade 5 teacher.
As another example, if you look at the stars, with no indoctrination, you wouldn’t think they were trillions of miles away. They told us they’re far away, but why? To support all the other lies of the “solar system,” “galaxy,” “Big Bang,” etc.
This leads to circular reasoning:
Space is a vacuum!
How do u know?
Because that’s the only way light can travel trillions of miles!
But how do u know stars are trillions of miles away?
Because space is a vacuum!
But how did you know space is a vacuum?
Because that’s the only way light could travel trillions of miles!
Another example of circular reasoning is gravity. Globe defenders cry out when I post about the Nile, because they say I don’t understand gravity, and that gravity makes rivers flow in all directions, because it’s pulling everything towards the center of the earth. But what evidence do we have that gravity is pulling everything to the center of the earth?
They don’t realize gravity is an assumption because it’s an assumption shared by so many, particularly the priests of scientism and science teachers. Unfortunately, most teachers are just repeating what they were taught, without objectively verifying it. And as for the elites at the top of the pyramid, they may know, but they ain’t tellin’.
So you get what we have daily on my Twitter:
*science bro puts forth an assumption
*someone points out that it’s an assumption
*he gets mad, throws insults, or changes the subject
I don’t write much about evolution, because my focus is Flat Earth, but the same is true there. The “billions-of-years” lie only exists to prop up the other lies. The notion that Slime + Time = a bald eagle, or whatever, is nonsense. No one would believe a bald eagle just magically appeared one day, so they concocted the idea that over millions of years, a bald eagle might appear. It’s still nonsense, but seems to be somehow more palatable nonsense.
Apart from Bill Nye & Co. telling you earth is millions of years old, what evidence do you have? When you look around, what makes you go, “Oh yeah, gazillions of years?” The carbon dating process that suggests fossils are gorillions of years old has been proven a hoax. Even the Grand Canyon, which scientism teaches was formed over zillions of years, was created by the sudden rushing waters of the Great Flood.
Anyways! I’ve gone off-topic here! But I guess that’s the luxury of a blog post as opposed to a Twitter! Many many thanks for reading and I’ll see you around!
P.S. If you have another example of circular reasoning in scientism, please leave it in the comments!